Thanks to MJ for planting the seed for this post. If you were one of the lucky ones to get Keith’s “Building Reliable Trading Systems – Tradable Strategies that Perform as They Backtest and Meet Your Risk-Reward Goals” book by John Wiley 2013 at the list price of $75 count yourself lucky. The book sells for a multiple of that on Amazon.com. Is there anything earth shattering in the book you might ask? I wouldn’t necessarily say that, but there are some very well thought out and researched topics that most traders would find of interest.
Bar Scoring
In his book Keith discusses the concept of bar-scoring. In Keith’s words, “Bar-scoring is an objective way to classify an instrument’s movement potential every bar. The two parts of the bar-scoring are the criterion and the resultant profit X days hence.” Keith provides several bar scoring techniques, but I highlight just one.
Keith broke these patterns down into the relationship of the close to the open, and close in the upper half of the range; close greater than the open and close in the lower half of the range. He extended the total number of types to 8 by adding the relationship of the close of the bar to yesterdays bar.
The PatternSmasher code can run through a binary representation
for each pattern and test holding the position for an optimizable number of days. It can also check for long and short positions. The original Pattern Smasher code used a for-loop to create patterns that were then compared to the real life facsimile. In this code it was easier to just manually define the patterns and assign them the binary string.
if c[0]> c[1] and c[0] > o[0] and c[0] > (h[0] + l[0])/2 then patternString = "----"; if c[0]> c[1] and c[0] > o[0] and c[0] < (h[0] + l[0])/2 then patternString = "---+"; if c[0]> c[1] and c[0] < o[0] and c[0] > (h[0] + l[0])/2 then patternString = "--+-"; if c[0]> c[1] and c[0] < o[0] and c[0] < (h[0] + l[0])/2 then patternString = "--++"; if c[0]< c[1] and c[0] > o[0] and c[0] > (h[0] + l[0])/2 then patternString = "-+--"; if c[0]< c[1] and c[0] > o[0] and c[0] < (h[0] + l[0])/2 then patternString = "-+-+"; if c[0]< c[1] and c[0] < o[0] and c[0] > (h[0] + l[0])/2 then patternString = "-++-"; if c[0]< c[1] and c[0] < o[0] and c[0] < (h[0] + l[0])/2 then patternString = "-+++";
Manual Pattern Designations
Please check my code for any errors. Here I go through the 8 different relationships and assign them to a Patter String. “-+++” represents pattern number (7 ) or type (7 + 1 = 8 – my strings start out at 0). You can then optimize the test pattern and if the test pattern matches the actual pattern, then the Pattern Smasher takes the trade on the opening of the next bar and holds it for the number of days you specify. You an also designate long and short positions in the code. Here I optimized the 8 patterns going long and short and holding from 1-4 days.
Here is the equity curve! Remember these are Hypothetical Results with $0 commission/slippage and historic performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Educational purposes only! This is tested on ES.D
Play around with the code and let me know if you find any errors or any improvements.
{written by George Pruitt -- copyright 2019 by George Pruitt This will test a 4 day pattern based on the open to close relationship. A plus represents a close greater than its open, whereas a minus represents a close less than its open. The default pattern is set to pattern 14 +++- (1110 binary). You can optimize the different patterns by optimizing the patternTests input from 1 to 16 and the orbAmount from .01 to whatever you like. Same goes for the hold days, but in this case you optimize start at zero. The LorS input can be optimized from 1 to 2 with 1 being buy and 2 being sellshort.}
if(mod(value1,2) = 1) or value1 = 1 then patternBitChanger[0] = 1; value2 = value1 - patternBitChanger[0] * 1;
if(value2 >= 7) then begin patternBitChanger[3] = 1; value2 = value2 - 8; end;
if(value2 >= 4) then begin patternBitChanger[2] = 1; value2 = value2 - 4; end; if(value2 = 2) then patternBitChanger[1] = 1; end;
for iCnt = 3 downto 0 begin if(patternBitChanger[iCnt] = 1) then begin patternTest = patternTest + "+"; end else begin patternTest = patternTest + "-"; end; end;
patternString = "";
if c[0]> c[1] and c[0] > o[0] and c[0] > (h[0] + l[0])/2 then patternString = "----"; if c[0]> c[1] and c[0] > o[0] and c[0] < (h[0] + l[0])/2 then patternString = "---+"; if c[0]> c[1] and c[0] < o[0] and c[0] > (h[0] + l[0])/2 then patternString = "--+-"; if c[0]> c[1] and c[0] < o[0] and c[0] < (h[0] + l[0])/2 then patternString = "--++"; if c[0]< c[1] and c[0] > o[0] and c[0] > (h[0] + l[0])/2 then patternString = "-+--"; if c[0]< c[1] and c[0] > o[0] and c[0] < (h[0] + l[0])/2 then patternString = "-+-+"; if c[0]< c[1] and c[0] < o[0] and c[0] > (h[0] + l[0])/2 then patternString = "-++-"; if c[0]< c[1] and c[0] < o[0] and c[0] < (h[0] + l[0])/2 then patternString = "-+++";
if(barNumber = 1) then print(elDateToString(date)," pattern ",patternTest," ",patternTests-1); if(patternString = patternTest) then begin
// print(date," ",patternString," ",patternTest); //uncomment this and you can print out the pattern if (enterNextBarAtOpen) then begin if(LorS = 2) then SellShort("PatternSell") next bar on open; if(LorS = 1) then buy("PatternBuy") next bar at open; end else begin if(LorS = 2) then SellShort("PatternSellBO") next bar at open of tomorrow - avgTrueRange(atrAvgLen) * orbAmount stop; if(LorS = 1) then buy("PatternBuyBO") next bar at open of tomorrow + avgTrueRange(atrAvgLen) * orbAmount stop; end;
end;
if(holdDays = 0 ) then setExitonClose; if(holdDays > 0) then begin if(barsSinceEntry = holdDays and LorS = 2) then BuyToCover("xbarLExit") next bar at open; if(barsSinceEntry = holdDays and LorS = 1) then Sell("xbarSExit") next bar at open; end;
I have always been a big fan of trailing stops. They serve two purposes – lock in some profit and give the market room to vacillate. A pure trailing stop will move up as the market makes new highs, but a ratcheting stop (my version) only moves up when a certain increment or multiple of profit has been achieved. Here is a chart of a simple 30 minute break out on the ES day session. I plot the buy and short levels and the stop level based on whichever level is hit first.
When you program something like this you never know what is the best profit trigger or the best profit retention value. So, you should program this as a function of these two values. Here is the code.
If d <> d[1] then Begin longMult = 0; shortMult = 0; myBarCount = 0; mp = 0; lep = 0; sep = 0; buysToday = 0; shortsToday = 0; end;
myBarCount = myBarCount + 1;
If myBarCount = 6 then // six 5 min bars = 30 minutes Begin stb = highD(0); //get the high of the day sts = lowD(0); //get low of the day end;
If myBarCount >= 6 and buysToday + shortsToday = 0 and high >= stb then begin mp = 1; //got long - illustrative purposes only lep = stb;
end; If myBarCount >=6 and buysToday + shortsToday = 0 and low <= sts then begin mp = -1; //got short sep = sts; end;
If myBarCount >=6 then Begin plot3(stb,"buyLevel"); plot4(sts,"shortLevel"); end; If mp = 1 then buysToday = 1; If mp =-1 then shortsToday = 1;
// Okay initially you want a X point stop and then pull the stop up // or down once price exceeds a multiple of Y points // longMult keeps track of the number of Y point multipes of profit // always key off of lep(LONG ENTRY POINT) // notice how I used + 1 to determine profit // and - 1 to determine stop level If mp = 1 then Begin If h >= lep + (longMult + 1) * ratchetAmt then longMult = longMult + 1; plot1(lep + (longMult - 1) * trailAmt,"LE-Ratchet"); end;
If mp = -1 then Begin If l <= sep - (shortMult + 1) * ratchetAmt then shortMult = shortMult + 1; plot2(sep - (shortMult - 1) * trailAmt,"SE-Ratchet"); end;
Ratcheting Stop Code
So, basically I set my multiples to zero on the first bar of the trading session. If the multiple = 0 and you get into a long position, then your initial stop will be entryPrice + (0 – 1) * trailAmt. In other words your stop will be trailAmt (6 in this case) below entryPrce. Once price exceeds or meets 7 points above entry price, you increment the multiple (now 1.) So, you stop becomes entryPrice + (1-1) * trailAmt – which equals a break even stop. This logic will always move the first stop to break even. Assume the market moves 2 multiples into profit (14 points), what would your stop be then?
See how it ratchets. Now you can optimized the profit trigger and profit retention values. Since I am keying of entryPrice your first trailing stop move will be a break-even stop.
This isn’t a strategy but it could very easily be turned into one.
In this post, I want to share some code that I was surprised wasn’t really all that accessible. I was in need of passing a 2-D array to a function and couldn’t remember the exact syntax. The semantics of the problem is pretty straightforward.
Build Array
Pass Array as Reference
Unpack Array
Do Calculation
A 2D Array Is Just Like a Table
Any readers please correct me if I am wrong here, but you can’t use dynamic arrays on any dimension greater than 1. A dynamic array is one where you don’t initially know the size of the array so you leave it blank and TradeStation allocates memory dynamically. Also, there are a plethora of built-in functions that only work with dynamic arrays. Once we step up in dimension then that all goes out the window. I know what you are thinking, just use multiple dynamic arrays. Sometimes you want to keep the accounting down to a minimum and a matrix or table fits this bill. So if you do use multi-dimension arrays just remember you will need to know the total number of rows and columns in your table. Table? What do you mean table? I thought we were talking about arrays. Well, we are and a two-dimensional array can look like a table with rows as your first index and columns as your second. Just like an Excel spreadsheet. First, let’s create a very small and simple table in EasyLangauge:
array: testArray[2,2](0);
Once begin testArray[0,0] = 100; testArray[0,1] = 5;
You will notice I used the keyword Once. I use this whenever I want to play around with some code in my EasyLanguage Sandbox. Huh? In programmer-ese a Sandbox is a quick and dirty environment that runs very quickly and requires nearly zero overhead. So here I apply the code to print out just one line of output when applied to any chart. Notice how I declare the 2-D array – use the keyword Array: and the name of the array or table and allocate the total number of rows as the first argument and the total number of columns as the second argument. Also notice the arguments are separated by a comma and enclosed in square brackets. The following value enclosed in parentheses is the default value of every element in the array. Remember arrays are zero-based in EasyLanguage. So if you dimension an array with the number 2 you access the rows with 0 and 1 and 2. Same goes for columns as well. Did you catch that. If you dimension an array with the number 2 shouldn’t there be just 2 rows? Well in EasyLanguage when you dimension an array you get a free element at row 0 and column 0. In EasyLanguage you can just ignore row 0 and column 0 if you like. Here is the code if you ignore row 0 and column 0.
Should I Use Row 0 and Column Zero – It’s A Preference
array: testArray[2,2](0);
Once begin testArray[1,1] = 100; testArray[1,2] = 5;
Even though you get one free row you still cannot go beyond the boundaries of the array size. If I were to say something like:
testArray[3,1] = 300;
I would get an error message. If you want to work with a zero element then all of your code must coincide with that. If not, then your code shouldn’t try to access row 0 or column 0. Okay here is the function that I programmed for this little test:
For j= 1 to numOfRows Begin print(j," ",tempArray[j,whichColumn]); If tempArray[j,whichColumn] > tempHi then tempHi = tempArray[j,whichColumn]; end;
GetArrayHH = tempHi;
Function That Utilizes a 2D Array
Notice in the inputs how I declare the tempArray with the values x and y. You could have used a and b if you like or any other letters. This informs the compiler to expect a 2D array. It doesn’t know the size and that’s not important as long as you control the boundaries from the calling routine. The second parameter is the number of rows in the table and the third parameter is the column I am interested in. In this example, I am interested in column 2.
The Caller Function is the QuarterBack – Make Sure You Don’t Throw it Out of Bounds
Again this function assumes the caller will prevent stepping out of bounds. I loop the number of rows in the table and examine the second column and keep track of the highest value. I then return the highest column value.
This was a simple post, but remembering the syntax can be tough and know that EasyLangauge is zero-based when it comes to arrays is nice to know. You can also use this format for your own Sandbox.
Just a quick post here. I was asked how to keep track of the opening price for each time frame from our original Multi-Time Frame indicator and I was answering the question when I thought about modifying the indicator. This version keeps track of each discrete time frame. The original simply looked back a multiple of the base chart to gather the highest highs and lowest lows and then would do a simple calculation to determine the trend. So let’s say its 1430 on a five-minute bar and you are looking back at time frame 2. All I did was get the highest high and lowest low two bars back and stored that information as the high and low of time frame 2. Time frame 3 simply looked back three bars to gather that information. However if you tried to compare these values to a 10-minute or 15-minute chart they would not match.
In this version, I use the modulus function to determine the demarcation of each time frame. If I hit the border of the time frame I reset the open, high, low and carry that value over until I hit the next demarcation. All the while collecting the highest highs and lowest lows. In this model, I am working my way from left to right instead of right to left. And in doing so each time frame is discrete.
If condition10 then setPlotColor(1,Green) else SetPlotColor(1,Red); If condition11 then setPlotColor(2,Green) else SetPlotColor(2,Red); If condition12 then setPlotColor(3,Green) else SetPlotColor(3,Red); If condition13 then setPlotColor(4,Green) else SetPlotColor(4,Red); If condition14 then setPlotColor(5,Green) else SetPlotColor(5,Red);
condition6 = condition10 and condition11 and condition12 and condition13 and condition14; Condition7 = not(condition10) and not(condition11) and not(condition12) and not(condition13) and not(condition14);
If condition6 then setPlotColor(7,Green); If condition7 then setPlotColor(7,Red);
If condition6 or condition7 then plot7(7,"trend");
Last month’s post on using the elcollections dictionary was a little thin so I wanted to elaborate on it and also develop a trading system around the best patterns that are stored in the dictionary. The concept of the dictionary exists in most programming languages and almost all the time uses the (key)–>value model. Just like a regular dictionary a word or a key has a unique definition or value. In the last post, we stored the cumulative 3-day rate of return in keys that looked like “+ + – –” or “+ – – +“. We will build off this and create a trading system that finds the best pattern historically based on average return. Since its rather difficult to store serial data in a Dictionary I chose to use Wilder’s smoothing average function.
Ideally, I Would Have Liked to Use a Nested Dictionary
Initially, I played around with the idea of the pattern key pointing to another dictionary that contained not only the cumulative return but also the frequency that each pattern hit up. A dictionary is designed to have unique key–> to one value paradigm. Remember the keys are strings. I wanted to have unique key–> to multiple values. And you can do this but it’s rather complicated. If someone wants to do this and share, that would be great. AndroidMarvin has written an excellent manual on OOEL and it can be found on the TradeStation forums.
Ended Up Using A Dictionary With 2*Keys Plus an Array
So I didn’t want to take the time to figure out the nested dictionary approach or a vector of dictionaries – it gets deep quick. So following the dictionary paradigm I came up with the idea that words have synonyms and those definitions are related to the original word. So in addition to having keys like “+ + – -” or “- – + -” I added keys like “0”, “1” or “15”. For every + or – key string there exists a parallel key like “0” or “15”. Here is what it looks like:
– – – –
=
“0”
– – – +
=
“1”
– – + –
=
“2”
You can probably see the pattern here. Every “+” represents a 1 and every “0” represent 0 in a binary-based numbering system. In the + or – key I store the last value of Wilders average and in the numeric string equivalent, I store the frequency of the pattern.
Converting String Keys to Numbers [Back and Forth]
To use this pattern mapping I had to be able to convert the “++–” to a number and then to a string. I used the numeric string representation as a dictionary key and the number as an index into an array that store the pattern frequency. Here is the method I used for this conversion. Remember a method is just a function local to the analysis technique it is written.
//Lets convert the string to unique number method int convertPatternString2Num(string pattString) Vars: int pattLen, int idx, int pattNumber; begin pattLen = strLen(pattString); pattNumber = 0; For idx = pattLen-1 downto 0 Begin If MidStr(pattString,pattLen-idx,1) = "+" then pattNumber = pattNumber + power(2,idx); end; Return (pattNumber); end;
String Pattern to Number
This is a simple method that parses the string from left to right and if there is a “+” it is raised to the power(2,idx) where idx is the location of “+” in the string. So “+ + – – ” turns out to be 8 + 4 + 0 + 0 or 12.
Once I retrieve the number I used it to index into my array and increment the frequency count by one. And then store the frequency count in the correct slot in the dictionary.
patternNumber = convertPatternString2Num(patternString); //Keep track of pattern hits patternCountArray[patternNumber] = patternCountArray[patternNumber] + 1; //Convert pattern number to a string do use as a Dictionary Key patternStringNum = numToStr(patternNumber,2); //Populate the pattern number string key with the number of hits patternDict[patternStringNum] = patternCountArray[patternNumber] astype double;
Store Value In Array and Dictionary
Calculating Wilder’s Average Return and Storing in Dictionary
Once I have stored an instance of each pattern [16] and the frequency of each pattern[16] I calculate the average return of each pattern and store that in the dictionary as well.
//Calculate the percentage change after the displaced pattern hits Value1 = (c - c[2])/c[2]*100; //Populate the dictionary with 4 ("++--") day pattern and the percent change if patternDict.Contains(patternString) then Begin patternDict[patternString] = (patternDict[patternString] astype double * (patternDict[patternStringNum] astype double - 1.00) + Value1) / patternDict[patternStringNum] astype double; end Else begin patternDict[patternString] = value1; // print("Initiating: ",patternDict[patternString] astype double); end;
(pAvg * (N-1) + return) / N
When you extract a value from a collection you must us an identifier to expresses its data type or you will get an error message : patternDict[patternString] holds a double value {a real number} as well as patternDict[patternStringNum] – so I have to use the keyword asType. Once I do my calculation I ram the new value right back into the dictionary in the exact same slot. If the pattern string is not in the dictionary (first time), then the Else statement inserts the initial three-day rate of return.
Sort Through All of The Patterns and Find the Best!
The values in a dictionary are stored in alphabetic order and the string patterns are arranged in the first 16 keys. So I loop through those first sixteen keys and extract the highest return value as the “best pattern.”
// get the best pattern that produces the best average 3 bar return vars: hiPattRet(0),bestPattString(""); If patternDict.Count > 29 then Begin index = patternDict.Keys; values = patternDict.Values; hiPattRet = 0; For iCnt = 0 to 15 Begin If values[iCnt] astype double > hiPattRet then Begin hiPattRet = values[iCnt] astype double ; bestPattString = index[iCnt] astype string; end; end; // print(Date," BestPattString ",bestPattString," ",hiPattRet:8:4," CurrPattString ",currPattString); end;
Extract Best Pattern From All History
If Today’s Pattern Matches the Best Then Take the Trade
// if the current pattern matches the best pattern then bar next bar at open If currPattString = BestPattString then buy next bar at open; // cover in three days If barsSinceEntry > 2 then sell next bar at open;
Does Today Match the Best Pattern?
If today matches the best pattern then buy and cover after the second day.
Conclusion
I didn’t know if this code was worth proffering up but I decided to posit it because it contained a plethora of programming concepts: dictionary, method, string manipulation, and array. I am sure there is a much better way to write this code but at least this gets the point across.
var: patternTest(""),tempString(""),patternString(""),patternStringNum(""); var: patternNumber(0); var: iCnt(0),jCnt(0); //Lets convert the string to unique number method int convertPatternString2Num(string pattString) Vars: int pattLen, int idx, int pattNumber; begin pattLen = strLen(pattString); pattNumber = 0; For idx = pattLen-1 downto 0 Begin If MidStr(pattString,pattLen-idx,1) = "+" then pattNumber = pattNumber + power(2,idx); end; Return (pattNumber); end;
once begin clearprintlog; patternDict = new dictionary; index = new vector; values = new vector; end;
//Convert 4 day pattern displaced by 2 days patternString = ""; for iCnt = 5 downto 2 begin if(close[iCnt]> close[iCnt+1]) then begin patternString = patternString + "+"; end else begin patternString = patternString + "-"; end; end;
//What is the current 4 day pattern vars: currPattString(""); currPattString = "";
for iCnt = 3 downto 0 begin if(close[iCnt]> close[iCnt+1]) then begin currPattString = currPattString + "+"; end else begin currPattString = currPattString + "-"; end; end;
//Get displaced pattern number patternNumber = convertPatternString2Num(patternString); //Keep track of pattern hits patternCountArray[patternNumber] = patternCountArray[patternNumber] + 1; //Convert pattern number to a string do use as a Dictionary Key patternStringNum = numToStr(patternNumber,2); //Populate the pattern number string key with the number of hits patternDict[patternStringNum] = patternCountArray[patternNumber] astype double; //Calculate the percentage change after the displaced pattern hits Value1 = (c - c[2])/c[2]*100; //Populate the dictionary with 4 ("++--") day pattern and the percent change if patternDict.Contains(patternString) then Begin patternDict[patternString] = (patternDict[patternString] astype double * (patternDict[patternStringNum] astype double - 1.00) + Value1) / patternDict[patternStringNum] astype double; end Else begin patternDict[patternString] = value1; // print("Initiating: ",patternDict[patternString] astype double); end; // get the best pattern that produces the best average 3 bar return vars: hiPattRet(0),bestPattString(""); If patternDict.Count > 29 then Begin index = patternDict.Keys; values = patternDict.Values; hiPattRet = 0; For iCnt = 0 to 15 Begin If values[iCnt] astype double > hiPattRet then Begin hiPattRet = values[iCnt] astype double ; bestPattString = index[iCnt] astype string; end; end; // print(Date," BestPattString ",bestPattString," ",hiPattRet:8:4," CurrPattString ",currPattString); end; // if the current pattern matches the best pattern then bar next bar at open If currPattString = BestPattString then buy next bar at open; // cover in three days If barsSinceEntry > 2 then sell next bar at open;
The dictionary object in EasyLanguage works just like a real dictionary. It stores values that referenced by a key. In a real-life dictionary, the keys would be words and the values would be the definitions of those words.
An Introduction
This little bit of code just barely skims the surface of the dictionary object, but it gives enough to get a nice introduction to such a powerful tool. I am piggybacking off of my Pattern Smasher code here, so you might recognize some of it.
Object Delcaration
Like any of the objects in EasyLanguage a dictionary must be declared initially.
once begin clearprintlog; patternDict = new dictionary; index = new vector; values = new vector; end;
Declaring Objects
Here I tell the editor that I am going to be using the elsystem.collections and then a declare/define a dictionary named patterDict and two vectors: index and values. In the Once block, I create instances of the three objects. This is boilerplate stuff for object instantiation.
for iCnt = 5 downto 2 begin if(close[iCnt]> close[iCnt+1]) then begin patternString = patternString + "+"; end else begin patternString = patternString + "-"; end; end;
If patternString = "+++-" then Value99 = value99 + (c - c[2])/c[2];
if patternDict.Contains(patternString) then Begin // print("Found pattern: ",patternString," 3-day return is: ", (c - c[2])/c[2]); patternDict[patternString] = patternDict[patternString] astype double + (c - c[2])/c[2]; end Else patternDict[patternString] = (c - c[2])/c[2];
Build the Pattern String and Then Store It
The keys that index into the dictionary are strings. In this very simple example, I want to examine all of the different combinations of the last four-bar closing prices. Once the pattern hits up I want to accumulate the percentage change over the past three days and store that value in the location pointed to by the patternString key.
Notice how I displace the loop by three days (5-2 insteat of 3-0)? I do this so I can compare the close at the end of the pattern with today’s close, hence gathering the percentage change. Also, notice that I test to make sure there is an entry in the dictionary with the specific key string. If there wasn’t already an entry with the key and I tried to reference the value I would get an error message – “unable to cast null object.”
Once I store the keys and values I can regurgitate the entire dictionary very simply. The keys and values are stored as vectors. I can simply assign these components of the dictionary to the two vectors I instantiated earlier.
If lastBarOnChart and patternDict.Count > 0 then Begin index = patternDict.Keys; values = patternDict.Values; For iCnt = 0 to patternDict.Count-1 Begin print(index[iCnt] astype string," ",values[iCnt] astype double); end; print("Value99 : ",value99:8:4); end;
Printing Out the Dictionary
And then I can simply index into the vectors to print out their contents. I will add some more commentary on this post a little later this week. I hope you find this useful. And remember this will not work with MultiCharts.
This indicator plots five different time frames as a stacked chart. The circles or dots at the bottom represent the difference between the closing price of each time frame and its associated pivot price [(high + low + close)/3]. The value plotted at 4, in this case, represents the 5 minute time frame. The 10-minute time frame is represented by the plot at 3 and so on. The value plotted at 7 represents the composite of all the time frames. It is only turned on if all times are either red or green. If there is a disagreement then nothing is plotted.
This indicator is relatively simple even though the plot looks complicated. You have to make sure the indicator is plotted in a separate pane. The y – axis has 0 and 8 as its boundaries. All you have to do is keep track of the highest highs/lowest lows for each time frame. I use a multiplier of the base time frame to create different time frames. TimeFrame1Mult = 2 represents 10 minutes and TimeFrame2Mult = 3 and that represents 15 minutes. The indicator shows how strong the current swing is across five different time frames. When you start getting a mix of green and red dots this could indicate a short term trend change. You can use the EasyLanguage to plug in any indicator over the different time frames. Here’s the code. Just email me with questions or if you see a mistake in the coding.
{EasyLanguage MultiTime Frame Indicator) written by George Pruitt - copyright 2019 by George Pruitt }
If condition10 then setPlotColor(1,Green) else SetPlotColor(1,Red); If condition11 then setPlotColor(2,Green) else SetPlotColor(2,Red); If condition12 then setPlotColor(3,Green) else SetPlotColor(3,Red); If condition13 then setPlotColor(4,Green) else SetPlotColor(4,Red); If condition14 then setPlotColor(5,Green) else SetPlotColor(5,Red);
condition6 = condition10 and condition11 and condition12 and condition13 and condition14; Condition7 = not(condition10) and not(condition11) and not(condition12) and not(condition13) and not(condition14);
If condition6 then setPlotColor(7,Green); If condition7 then setPlotColor(7,Red);
If condition6 or condition7 then plot7(7,"trend");
Let’s say you want to carve out a special session of data from the 24-hour data session – maybe keep track of the highest high and lowest low from 9:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. the next day. How would you do it?
To start with you would need to reset the highest high and lowest low values each day. So you could say if the current bars time > StartTime and the prior bars time <= StartTime then you know the first bar of your specialized session has started. So far so good. If the time falls outside the boundaries of your special session then you want to ignore that data -right? What about this:
If t >StartTime and t <= EndTime then…
{Remember EasyLanguage uses the end time stamp for its intraday bars}
Sounds good. But what happens when time equals 2300 or 11:00 p.m.? You want to include this time in your session but the if-then construct doesn’t work. 2300 is greater than 2100 but it’s not less than 1600 so it doesn’t pass the test. The problems arise when the EndTime < StartTime. It really isn’t since the EndTime is for the next day, but the computer doesn’t know that. What to do? Here is a quick little trick to help you solve this problem: use a special offset if the time falls in a certain range.
EndTimeOffset = 0 ;
If t >=StartTime and t <= 2359 then EndTimeOffset= 2400 – EndTime;
Going back to our example of the current time of 2300 and applying this little bit of code our EndTimeOffset would be equal to 2400 – 1600 or 800. So if t = 2300, you subtract 800 and get 1500 and that works.
2300 – 800 = 1500 which is less than 1600 –> works
What if t = 300 or 3:00 a.m. Then EndTimeOffset = 0; 300 – 0 is definitely less than 1600.
That solves the problem with the EndTime. Or does it? What if EndTime is like 1503? So you have 2400 – 1503 which is something like 897. What if time is 2354 and you subtract 897 you get 1457 and that still works since its less than 1503. Ok, what about if EndTime = 1859 then you get 2400 – 1859 which equals 541. If time = 2354 and you subtract 541 you get 1843 and that still works.
Is there a similar problem with the StartTime? If t = 3:00 a.m. then it is not greater than our StartTime of 2100, but we want it in our window. We need another offset. This time we want to make a StartTime offset equal to 2400 when we cross the 0:00 timeline. And then reset it to zero when we cross the StartTime timeline. Let’s see if it works:
t = 2200 : is t > StartTime? Yes
t=0002 : is t > StartTime? No, but should be. We crossed the 0000 timeline so we need to add 2400 to t and then compare to StartTime:
t + 2400 = 2402 and it is greater than StartTime. Make sense?
If t >= StartTime and t[1] < StartTime then StartTimeOffSet = 0; EndTimeOffSet = 0; If t >= StartTime and t <= 2359 then EndTimeOffSet = 2400 - EndTime; If t < t[1] then StartTimeOffSet = 2400;
TimeOffsets = 1;
Function To Calculate Start and End Time Offsets
Here is an the indicator code that calls the function:
If t+startOffset > startTimeWindow and t-endOffSet <=endTimeWindow then Begin
end Else Begin print(d," ",t," outside time window "); end;
Calling TimeOffsets Function
Hope this helps you out. I am posting this for two reasons: 1) to help out and 2) prevent me from reinventing the wheel every time I have to use time constraints on a larger time frame of data.
StartTimeWindow = 2300
EndTimeWindow = 1400
Time = 2200, FALSE
Time = 2315, TRUE [2315 > 2300 and 2315 – (2400 -1400) <1400)]
This code should work with all times. Shoot me an email if you find it doesn’t.
I had a reader of the blog ask how to use Optimal F. That was really a great question. A few posts back I provided the OptimalFGeo function but didn’t demonstrate on how to use it for allocation purposes. In this post, I will do just that.
I Have Optimal F – Now What?
From Ralph Vince’s book, “Portfolio Management Formulas”, he states: “Once the highest f is found, it can readily be turned into a dollar amount by dividing the biggest loss by the negative optimal f. For example, if our biggest loss is $100 and our optimal f is 0.25, then -$100/ 0.25 = $400. In other words, we should bet 1 unit for every $400 we have in our stake.”
Convert Optimal F to dollars and then to number of shares
In my example strategy, I start out with an initial capital of $50,000 and allow reinvestment of profit or loss. The protective stop is set as 3 X ATR(10). A fixed $2000 profit objective is also utilized. The conversion form Optimal F to position size is illustrated by the following lines of code:
//keep track of biggest loss biggestLoss = minList(positionProfit(1),biggestLoss); //calculate the Optimal F with last 10 trades. OptF = OptimalFGeo(10); //reinvest profit or loss risk$ = initCapital$ + netProfit; //convert Optimal F to $$$ if OptF <> 0 then numShares = risk$ / (biggestLoss / (-1*OptF));
Code snippet - Optimal F to Position Size
Keep track of biggest loss
Calculate optimal F with OptimalFGeo function – minimum 10 trades
Calculate Risk$ by adding InitCapital to current NetProfit (Easylanguage keyword)
Calculate position size by dividing Risk$ by the quotient of biggest loss and (-1) Optimal F
I applied the Optimal F position sizing to a simple mean reversion algorithm where you buy on a break out in the direction of the 50-day moving average after a lower low occurs.
//keep track of biggest loss biggestLoss = minList(positionProfit(1),biggestLoss); //calculate the Optimal F with last 10 trades. OptF = OptimalFGeo(10); //reinvest profit or loss risk$ = initCapital$ + netProfit; //convert Optimal F to $$$ if OptF <> 0 then numShares = risk$ / (biggestLoss / (-1*OptF)); numShares = maxList(1,numShares); //if Optf <> 0 then print(d," ",t," ",risk$ / (biggestLoss / (-1*OptF))," ",biggestLoss," ",optF);
if c > average(c,50) and low < low[1] then Buy numShares shares next bar at open + .25* range stop;
setStopPosition; setProfitTarget(2000);
setStopLoss(3*avgTrueRange(10)*bigPointValue);
Strategy Using Optimal F
I have included the results below. At one time during the testing the number of contracts jumped up to 23. That is 23 mini Nasdaq futures ($20 * 7,300) * 23. That’s a lot of leverage and risk. Optimal doesn’t always mean the best risk mitigation. Please let me know if you find any errors in the code or in the logic.
Here is the ELD that incorporates the Strategy and the Function.USINGOPTIMALF
In Keith’s wonderful book, “Building Reliable Trading Sytems”, he reveals several algorithms that classify an instruments’ movement potential. In the part of the book that is titled Scoring by a Bar Type Criterion, he describes eight different two-day patterns that involve 3 different criteriaEight different Bar-Types
He looks at the relationship between today’s open and today’s close, today’s close and yesterday’s close, and today’s close in terms of the day’s range. Bar-Types 1 to 4 all have the close of today >= close of yesterday. Bar-Types 5 to 8 have close of today < close of yesterday.
I wanted to program this into my TradeStation and do some research to see if the concept is valid. In his book, Keith tested a lot of different stocks and commodities. In this post, I just test the ES, US, and Beans. This form of research can be used to enhance an existing entry technique.
Here is how I defined the eight different bar types:
array : barTypeArray[8](false);
midRange = (h + l)/2;
barTypeArray[0] = c >= c[1] and c > o and c >= midRange; barTypeArray[1] = c >= c[1] and c > o and c < midRange; barTypeArray[2] = c >= c[1] and c < o and c >= midRange; barTypeArray[3] = c >= c[1] and c < o and c < midRange; barTypeArray[4] = c < c[1] and c > o and c >= midRange; barTypeArray[5] = c < c[1] and c > o and c < midRange; barTypeArray[6] = c < c[1] and c < o and c >= midRange; barTypeArray[7] = c < c[1] and c < o and c <= midRange;
Defining Eight Different Bar Types
I used a brute force approach by creating an 8-element array of boolean values. Remember EasyLanguage uses a 0 index. If the two -day pattern matches one of the eight criteria I assign the element a true value. If it doesn’t match then a false value is assigned. I use an input value to tell the computer which pattern I am looking for. If I choose Bar-Type[0] and there is a true value in that array element then I take a trade. By providing this input I can optimize over all the different Bar-Types.
Input : BarTypeNumber(0), // which bar type buyOrSell(1), //1 to buy 2 to sell numDaysToHold(2); //how many days to hold position
For cnt = 0 to 7 //remember to start at 0 Begin If barTypeArray[cnt] = true then whichBarType = cnt; end;
If whichBarType = BarTypeNumber then begin if buyOrSell = 1 then buy this bar on close; if buyOrSell = 2 then sellshort this bar on close; end;
Loop Thru Array to find Bar Type
Here are some results of looping through all eight Bar-Types, Buy and Sell, and holding from 1 to 5 days.
ES – ten – year results – remember these are hypothetical results with no commission or slippage.
Here’s what the equity curve looks like. Wild swings lately!!
Beans:
Bonds
Keith was right – look at the Bar Category that bubbled to the top every time – the most counter-trend pattern. My Bar-Type Number 7 is the same as Keith’s 8. Here is the code in its entirety.
{Bar Scoring by Keith Fitschen from his book "Building Reliable Trading Systems" 2013 Wiley}
barTypeArray[0] = c >= c[1] and c > o and c >= midRange; barTypeArray[1] = c >= c[1] and c > o and c < midRange; barTypeArray[2] = c >= c[1] and c < o and c >= midRange; barTypeArray[3] = c >= c[1] and c < o and c < midRange; barTypeArray[4] = c < c[1] and c > o and c >= midRange; barTypeArray[5] = c < c[1] and c > o and c < midRange; barTypeArray[6] = c < c[1] and c < o and c >= midRange; barTypeArray[7] = c < c[1] and c < o and c <= midRange;
vars: whichBarType(0),cnt(0);
For cnt = 0 to 7 Begin If barTypeArray[cnt] = true then whichBarType = cnt; end;
If whichBarType = BarTypeNumber then begin if buyOrSell = 1 then buy this bar on close; if buyOrSell = 2 then sellshort this bar on close; end;
If barsSinceEntry = numDaysToHold then begin If marketPosition = 1 then sell this bar on close; If marketPosition =-1 then buytocover this bar on close; end;
Bar Scoring Example
Keith’s book is very well researched and written. Pick one up if you can find one under $500. I am not kidding. Check out Amazon.
Backtesting with [Trade Station,Python,AmiBroker, Excel]. Intended for informational and educational purposes only!
Get All Five Books in the Easing Into EasyLanguage Series - The Trend Following Edition is now Available!
Announcement – A Trend Following edition has been added to my Easing into EasyLanguage Series! This edition will be the fifth and final installment and will utilize concepts discussed in the Foundation editions. I will pay respect to the legends of Trend Following by replicating the essence of their algorithms. Learn about the most prominent form of algorithmic trading. But get geared up for it by reading the first four editions in the series now. Get your favorite QUANT the books they need!
This series includes five editions that covers the full spectrum of the EasyLanguage programming language. Fully compliant with TradeStation and mostly compliant with MultiCharts. Start out with the Foundation Edition. It is designed for the new user of EasyLanguage or for those you would like to have a refresher course. There are 13 tutorials ranging from creating Strategies to PaintBars. Learn how to create your own functions or apply stops and profit objectives. Ever wanted to know how to find an inside day that is also a Narrow Range 7 (NR7?) Now you can, and the best part is you get over 4 HOURS OF VIDEO INSTRUCTION – one for each tutorial.
This book is ideal for those who have completed the Foundation Edition or have some experience with EasyLanguage, especially if you’re ready to take your programming skills to the next level. The Hi-Res Edition is designed for programmers who want to build intraday trading systems, incorporating trade management techniques like profit targets and stop losses. This edition bridges the gap between daily and intraday bar programming, making it easier to handle challenges like tracking the sequence of high and low prices within the trading day. Plus, enjoy 5 hours of video instruction to guide you through each tutorial.
The Advanced Topics Edition delves into essential programming concepts within EasyLanguage, offering a focused approach to complex topics. This book covers arrays and fixed-length buffers, including methods for element management, extraction, and sorting. Explore finite state machines using the switch-case construct, text graphic manipulation to retrieve precise X and Y coordinates, and gain insights into seasonality with the Ruggiero/Barna Universal Seasonal and Sheldon Knight Seasonal methods. Additionally, learn to build EasyLanguage projects, integrate fundamental data like Commitment of Traders, and create multi-timeframe indicators for comprehensive analysis.
The Day Trading Edition complements the other books in the series, diving into the popular approach of day trading, where overnight risk is avoided (though daytime risk still applies!). Programming on high-resolution data, such as five- or one-minute bars, can be challenging, and this book provides guidance without claiming to be a “Holy Grail.” It’s not for ultra-high-frequency trading but rather for those interested in techniques like volatility-based breakouts, pyramiding, scaling out, and zone-based trading. Ideal for readers of the Foundation and Hi-Res editions or those with EasyLanguage experience, this book offers insights into algorithms that shaped the day trading industry.
For thirty-one years as the Director of Research at Futures Truth Magazine, I had the privilege of collaborating with renowned experts in technical analysis, including Fitschen, Stuckey, Ruggiero, Fox, and Waite. I gained invaluable insights as I watched their trend-following methods reach impressive peaks, face sharp declines, and ultimately rebound. From late 2014 to early 2020, I witnessed a dramatic downturn across the trend-following industry. Iconic systems like Aberration, CatScan, Andromeda, and Super Turtle—once thriving on robust trends of the 1990s through early 2010s—began to falter long before the pandemic. Since 2020 we have seen the familiar trends return. Get six hours of video instruction with this edition.
Pick up your copies today – e-Book or paperback format – at Amazon.com